Every tool that claims to know you starts by deciding what kind of person you are. That step is where the useful part gets thrown away — the conclusion survives, the route to it does not.
Where it came from
Thirty interviews, one prompt: describe a decision you’re still unsure about. The answers converged on similar conclusions and diverged completely on how people got there — which order they considered things in, what they refused to trade, where they stopped.
What I’ve actually done
Four attempts at a representation. Each one held for a few weeks and then failed the same way: it described a person accurately enough to be useful, and by the time it was useful the person had moved.
Where it’s stuck
What would count as an answer
A representation someone can read back and correct — where being wrong about them is visible to them, not just to me. If they can’t argue with it, I’ve built a profile.
The measurement half of this is seed 02, and it has the same problem from the other side.
If this is your question too, I'd rather think about it with someone than publish a fifth draft alone.
GET IN TOUCH →